Are usually safest distance from the 5G cell Structure?

If  cell phone radiation effects on human body 've ever walked through a city you might have noticed tiny mini 5G cell towers placed on poles for street lighting. They look like small boxes however, they're actually transmitting wireless signals from mobile providers to your phone.

These smaller towers are replacing the larger built cell towers. While they're not as noticeable, they still can create issues for users.
The of the FCC's Radiation Exposure Thresholds

The FCC's Radiation Exposure Thresholds determine the maximum amount of time one can expose to electromagnetic energy generated by wireless devices. The limits for exposure are based upon scientific research which show that the energy of RF can cause harm to health.

The specific absorption rate (SAR) is an indicator of the radiofrequency energy that is taken up by tissues. It's typically 1.6 watts per kilogram, calculated over one gram of tissue.

But, since 5g operates at higher frequencies, it has the potential to create more energy on the skin and other directly-exposed body parts. This can lead to many potential problems, including an increased development of skin diseases like dermatitis, cancer of the skin and cataracts.

Due to the potential for negative effects of 5G radiation, PSU has chosen to establish a general, localized maximum power density of four MW/cm2 averaged over 1 cm2, and not exceeding 30 minutes for all 5G services running at 3000 GHz. This limit for localization is in line with the maximum spatial-average SAR of 1.6 W/kg, averaged over one grams of tissues at six GHz.
The FCC's Maximum Exposure Thresholds for Maximum Exposure

Have you ever used a cell phone, you probably know that the safest range from the tower is around 400 meters away.  5g radiation  is because the transmitting power of a cell tower increases dramatically the farther the tower is.

Although this may sound like a good idea, the reality is that people who live close to towers could be more susceptible to health problems. For example, a study from 2014 in India found that residents who lived within 50m of cell towers experienced significantly more health complaints than those who were away from the antennas.

But, the study revealed that those who relocated to areas further away from cell towers noticed their symptoms return to normal within a couple of days. Another study has shown that exposure to high frequencies of radiofrequency electromagnetic fields (EMFs) could cause brain tumors, cancers, and other health problems.

This is because RF radiation, which is used in wireless communication, can penetrate the human body's outer layer, called the skin. It is crucial to know because the skin serves as a shield against injury to the body, infection by pathogenic microorganisms, and the entry of harmful substances. Additionally, it is the largest organ in the human body. It is accountable for protecting other organs.
The FCC's Minimum Exposure Thresholds

The FCC's Minimum Exposure Thresholds rely on numerous assumptions that are not supported by scientific research. This includes the false assumption that short-term exposures to RF radiation is safe because of the minimal radiation penetration in the human body (i.e. thermal heating of tissue).

The assumption also ignores the more extensive penetration of ELF parts of the modulated RF signal as well as the effect of brief bursts of heat generated by RF waves that are pulsed. These theories are not compatible with current understanding of the biological consequences of RF radiation. As such, they should not be relied upon for health-protection exposure standards.

Additionally, the ICNIRP and FCC are limiting its maximum levels of radiation exposure for local peak SARs, based on the maximum spatial specific absorption rate (psSAR), which can be described as not a sufficient dosimetric tool to assess the amount of exposure to RF radiation. Particularly it is inconclusive when frequencies exceed 6 GHz. Furthermore, psSAR has not been tested for  5g radiation  exposed to other environmental agents such as sunlight. The interactions of RF radiation with other environmental agents could result in antagonistic or synergistic impacts. This would result in the risk of having adverse health consequences. For example, exposure to RF radiation along with exposure to sunlight can raise the chance of skin cancer, as well as aggravate other skin disorders, such as acne.