Are usually safest distance from your 5G cell Tower?
If you've ever walked through a city and spotted tiny 5G cell towers on street light poles. They appear like tiny boxes however, they're actually transmitting wireless signals from cell phone providers to your phone.
The smaller ones are being replaced by larger built cell towers. Although they're not as visible but they can still cause problems for people.
cell phone radiation effects on human body of the FCC's Radiation Exposure Thresholds
The FCC's Radiation Exposure Thresholds establish the safe limit at which an individual can be exposed to electromagnetic energy generated by wireless devices. The exposure limits are based upon scientific research that show that RF energy could be harmful to human health.
The specific absorption rate (SAR) is a measure of the radiofrequency energy absorption by tissues. It is typically 1.6 Watts per kilogram averaged over one kilogram of tissue.
Since 5g is able to transmit at higher frequencies this could be able to cause greater energy intensity on the skin and other exposed body areas. This can result in many potential harms, including exacerbated appearance of skin disorders like dermatitis, skin cancer and cataracts.
Due to the possible negative effects of 5G radiation, PSU has chosen to create a general maximum power density of four MW/cm2 averaged over 1 cm2, but not to exceed 30 minutes, for all 5G services at 3000 GHz. This localized limit is in accordance with the maximum SAR spatial-average of 1.6 W/kg averaged over 1 grams of tissues at six GHz.
The FCC's Maximum Exposure Thresholds
In the event that you've used mobile phone, you probably know that the safest distance from the tower is around 400 meters away. Proteck'd Emf is because the power of the transmission of cell towers increases drastically the further away your location from the tower.
Although this may sound like something that's good however, people who live close to towers may actually be more susceptible to health issues. For example, a study from 2014 in India found that residents living within 50 meters of cell towers had significant more health issues than those who lived farther away from the antennas.
This study revealed that those who relocated into areas farther away from the cell towers saw their symptoms return to normal within a couple of days. Studies have also demonstrated that exposure to extreme frequencies of radiofrequency electromagnetic fields (EMFs) could cause brain tumors, cancers, and other health problems.
This is because radiofrequency radiation, used in wireless communication can penetrate the human body's outer layer, which is the skin. It is crucial to know because the skin serves as a shield against mechanical injury, infection by pathogenic microorganisms, and entry of toxic substances. It is also the biggest organ of the human body, and is accountable for maintaining the integrity of other organs.
The FCC's Minimum Exposure Thresholds
The FCC's Minimum Exposition Thresholds are based upon numerous assumptions that are not supported by scientific evidence. They include the incorrect belief that exposures to RF radiation are safe because of the minimal radiation penetration in the human body (i.e. the heating of tissues).
The assumption also ignores the deeper penetration of the ELF elements of modulated radio signals as well as the effect of brief bursts of heat caused by RF pulses. These theories are not compatible with current understanding of the biological effects of RF radiation. As such they shouldn't be used for health protective exposure standards.
In addition, the ICNIRP and FCC restrict the maximum limits of exposure to peak local SARs that are based on the peak speed of spatial absorption (psSAR) that is an inadequate dosimetric tool for determining the level of exposure to RF radiation. Particularly it is inconclusive for frequencies above 6 GHz. Furthermore, psSAR has not been evaluated for RF radiation that is exposed to other environmental agents , such like sunlight. Interactions of RF radiation and other agents in the environment could result in antagonistic or synergistic effects. This would result in the risk of having adverse health adverse effects. For example, co-exposure to RF radiation with sunlight may increase the risk of skin cancer, and may also exacerbate other skin conditions like acne.
