Very best safest distance coming from a 5G cell Structure?
If you've ever been through a city and spotted tiny 5G cell towers on street light poles. They look like small boxes, but they're actually broadcasting wireless signals from cellular providers to your phone.
These smaller towers are replacing the larger specially-designed cell towers. While cell phone radiation 're not as noticeable however, they could create problems for those who live nearby.
It is the of the FCC's Radiation Exposure Thresholds
The FCC's Radiation Exposure Thresholds define the safe limit at which a person can be exposed to electromagnetic energy generated by wireless devices. The limits for exposure are based on scientific data that prove that electromagnetic energy could be harmful to health.
The absorption rate specific (SAR) is an indication of the radiofrequency energy that is absorption by tissues. It's usually 1.6 Watts per kilogram spread over a Gram of tissue.
Since 5g is able to transmit at higher frequencies and has the potential to cause greater energy intensity on the skin and other directly-exposed body parts. This can lead to many possible harms, like the formation of skin disorders such as dermatitis, cataracts and skin cancer.
Due to the possible negative effects of 5G radiation, PSU has chosen to establish a general, localized maximum power density of four mW/cm2 averaged on 1cm2, and never exceeding 30 minutes for all 5G services at 3000 GHz. This localized limit is in accordance with the maximum spatial-average SAR of 1.6 W/kg averaged over 1 g of tissue at 6 GHz.
The FCC's Maximum Exposure Thresholds
If you've ever used a cell phone, you're probably aware that a safe distance from the tower is at least 400 meters away. 5g radiation is due to the transmitting power of a cell tower increases dramatically the further your location from the tower.
While it sounds like an ideal idea but the truth is that people who live close to towers might be more vulnerable to health problems. For instance, a study conducted in 2014 in India discovered that those who lived within 50 meters from cell towers suffered much more health problems than those living further far from antennas.
However, this study also showed that residents who moved into areas farther away from cell towers noticed their symptoms improve within a few days. Other studies have demonstrated that exposure to extreme levels of radiofrequency electromagnetic fields (EMFs) can cause brain tumors, cancers and other health issues.
This is due to the fact that radiofrequency radiation, used in wireless communications, may penetrate the human body's outer layer of skin. It is crucial to know because the skin acts as a barrier to protect against injury to the body, infection caused by pathogenic microorganisms and the entry of harmful substances. Additionally, it is the most important organ of the human body, and is accountable for keeping the integrity of the other organs.
The FCC's Minimum Exposure Thresholds
The FCC's Minimum Exposure Thresholds rely on numerous assumptions that aren't supported by scientific research. This includes the false assumption that exposures to RF radiation are safe because of the minimal radiation penetration in the human body (i.e., tissue heating).
The assumption also ignores the more extensive penetration of ELF parts of modulated RF signals as well as the consequences of short bursts of heat caused by RF pulses. These assumptions are not in line with current knowledge of the biological consequences of RF radiation. Therefore they should not be used for health protective exposure standards.
Additionally to that, ICNIRP and FCC are limiting their radiation limits for local peak SARs based on the peak spatial specific absorption rate (psSAR) which is an inadequate dosimetric tool for determining the level of radiation exposure. In particular it is inconclusive for frequencies that exceed 6 GHz. Additionally, psSAR hasn't been evaluated for RF radiation exposed to other agents of the environment such as sunlight. In the event of interactions, RF radiation and other environmental agents may produce synergistic or antagonistic impacts. This would result in the risk of having adverse health consequences. For example, co-exposure to RF radiation and sunlight could increase the risk of skin cancer, and may also exacerbate other skin conditions like acne.