What is the safest distance coming from a 5G cell Structure?

If you've ever been through a town you might have noticed tiny mini 5G cell towers on the poles of street lights. They appear like tiny boxes however, they're actually transmitting wireless signals from mobile providers to your mobile.

These smaller towers are replacing the larger specially-designed cell towers. While they're less noticeable, they still can cause problems for people.
It is the Federal Communications Commission's Radiation Exposure Thresholds

The FCC's Radiation Exposure Thresholds define the safe limit at which a person can be exposed to electromagnetic energy generated by wireless devices. The limits for exposure are based on research which prove that electromagnetic energy can be harmful to human health.

The absorption rate specific (SAR) is an indicator of the radiofrequency energy that is absorption by tissues. It is typically 1.6 Watts per kilogram spread over a gram of tissue.

But, since 5g operates at higher frequencies and has the potential to increase the intensity of energy on the skin and other directly-exposed body areas.  Proteck'd Emf Apparel  can result in various possible harms, such as an increase in the development of skin conditions such as dermatitis, skin cancer and cataracts.

Due to the potential for negative effects of 5G radiation, PSU has chosen to establish a general, localized maximum power density of four MW/cm2 based on the average across 1 centimeter, and never to exceed 30 minutes, for all 5G services running at 3000 GHz. This localized limit is consistent with the highest SAR spatial-average of 1.6 W/kg, averaged over one g of tissue at 6 GHz.
The FCC's Maximum Exposure Thresholds

In the event that you've used cell phone, you probably know that the safest location from the tower is around 400 meters away. This is because the transmitting power of a cell tower increases dramatically the further away you are from it.

Although this may sound like an ideal idea, the reality is that people who live close to towers could be more prone to health problems. For instance, a study conducted in 2014 in India found that those who lived within 50m from cell towers suffered significant more health issues than those who lived farther away from the antennas.

However, this study also revealed that those who relocated to areas further away from cell towers experienced their symptoms return to normal within a few days. Another study has demonstrated that exposure to extreme amounts of electromagnetic field radiofrequency (EMFs) can lead to brain tumors, cancer as well as other health issues.

This is because RF radiation, which is utilized in wireless communications, can be absorbed by the body's outer layer, called the skin. This is vital to be aware of because the skin serves as a protective barrier against mechanical injury, infection caused by pathogenic microorganisms and infiltration of toxic substances. The skin is the biggest organ in the human body, and is responsible for maintaining the integrity of other organs.
The FCC's Minimum Exposure Thresholds

The FCC's Minimum Exposure Thresholds are based on many assumptions that aren't supported by scientific evidence. This includes the false assumption that short-term exposures to RF radiation are safe due to the limited radiation penetration in the human body (i.e. the heating of tissues).

This assumption does not take into account the more extensive penetration of ELF elements of modulated radio signals and the effects of brief bursts of heat from pulsed RF waves. These assumptions do not correspond with current understanding of the biological consequences of RF radiation, and thus they shouldn't be considered for health protection exposure guidelines.

Furthermore there is  5g radiation  that both ICNIRP and FCC limit their maximum exposure limits to local peak SARs that are based on the maximum spatial specific absorption rate (psSAR) that is not a sufficient dosimetric tool for determining the level of exposure to radiofrequency radiation. Particularly, psSAR is inaccurate for frequencies above 6 GHz. Furthermore, psSAR has not been tested for RF radiation that is exposed to other environmental agents , such as sunlight. The interactions of RF radiation and other agents in the environment could result in antagonistic or synergistic results. This could result in the risk of having adverse health adverse effects. For instance, exposure to RF radiation and sunlight could raise the chance of developing skin cancer and exacerbate other skin conditions like acne.