What is the safest distance coming from a 5G cell Structure?

If you've ever wandered through a town, you may have seen tiny cell towers for 5G placed on poles for street lighting. They appear like tiny boxes, but they're actually broadcasting wireless signals from cell phone providers to your mobile.

These smaller towers are replacing the larger built cell towers. While they're not as noticeable however, they could create issues for users.
A Federal Communications Commission's Radiation Exposure Thresholds

The FCC's Radiation Exposure Thresholds establish the maximum amount of time one can expose to electromagnetic energy generated by wireless devices. The limits of exposure are based upon scientific research which show that the energy of RF could be harmful to human health.

The specific absorption rate (SAR) is a measure of the radiofrequency energy absorption by tissues. It is typically 1.6 Watts per kilogram spread over a gram of tissue.

Since 5g is able to transmit at higher frequencies and has the potential to cause greater energy intensity on the skin as well as other body parts. This could lead to various potential problems, including an increased development of skin diseases such as dermatitis, skin cancer and cataracts.

Due to the possible negative effects of 5G radiation, PSU has chosen to set a general localized limits on power density, which is 4mW/cm2 measured across 1 centimeter, but not to exceed 30 minutes, for the entire 5G spectrum at 3000 GHz. This localized limit is in accordance with the maximum SAR that is spatially averaged at 1.6 W/kg, averaged over one 5 grams of body tissue, at 6 GHz.
The FCC's Maximum Exposure Thresholds

Have you ever used a mobile phone, you probably know that the safest range from the tower should be at least 400 meters.  5g radiation  is because the power of transmission from a cell tower increases dramatically the farther your location from the tower.

Although this may sound like a good idea however, people living in close proximity to towers may actually be more prone to health problems. For instance, a study conducted in 2014 in India found that those living within 50 meters of cell towers had much more health problems than those who lived farther distance from them.

This study revealed that those who relocated to areas that were further from cell towers experienced their symptoms return to normal within a few days. Studies have also demonstrated that exposure to extreme levels of radiofrequency electromagnetic fields (EMFs) can lead to brain tumors, cancers as well as other health issues.

This is due to the fact that radiofrequency radiation, used in wireless communication can be absorbed by the body's outer layer, the skin. This is important to understand because the skin acts as a protective barrier against mechanical injury, infection by pathogenic microorganisms, and entry of toxic substances. Additionally, it is the largest organ of the human body and is accountable for maintaining the integrity of other organs.
The FCC's Minimum Exposure Thresholds for the Minimum Exposure

The FCC's Minimum Exposure Thresholds rely on many assumptions that aren't supported by scientific evidence. These include the erroneous belief that exposures to RF radiations are not harmful because of the minimal absorption into body (i.e. the heating of tissues).

This also overlooks the more extensive penetration of ELF components of modulated RF signals, as well as the consequences on the body of short bursts generated by RF waves that are pulsed. These assumptions do not correspond with the current understanding of biological consequences of RF radiation. Therefore they shouldn't be relied upon for health-protection exposure guidelines.

In  Have a peek at this website , the ICNIRP and FCC limit its maximum levels of radiation exposure for local peak SARs that are based on the maximum spatial specific absorption rate (psSAR), which can be described as not a reliable dosimetric instrument to determine the degree of exposure to radiofrequency radiation. Particularly, psSAR is inaccurate when frequencies exceed 6 GHz. Additionally, psSAR hasn't been evaluated for RF radiation with co-exposure to other environmental agents , such as sunlight. Interactions of RF radiation with other environmental agents may produce synergistic or antagonistic effects. This can lead to an increased risk of adverse health consequences. For example, co-exposure to RF radiation with sunlight may cause an increase in the incidence of developing skin cancer and exacerbate other skin conditions like acne.